From: Rui Miguel Seabra (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Oct 22 2003 - 04:56:27 EDT
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 21:48, M. Fioretti wrote:
> Absolutely right. But, my comments come just from the fact that the
> previous GTk RPM wanted a libfribidi0 which is *not* in the fribidi
> RPMs available for RH9. Check my messages here for details.
Which ones are you talking about?
There's fribidi, libfribidi and libfribidi-devel.
I don't know exactly the logic of installation, but if IIRC fribidi was
to be installed in SuSe or Mandrake, while libfribidi and
libfribidi-devel followed best the RedHat practice.
There are some RPMS here:
Although you may need to rebuild the src.rpm (I don't remember if those
are for RH9 or RH8).
I thought I had put libfribidi rpms for 9 (the above might be it) and
ln'ed it on the savannah download site.
AFAICT, the fribidi developers don't publish rpms, but I think their
source is rpm'able.
Also, I don't plan to support Fedora Core RPMS so far, but I'm no longer
in proper conditions to support RH9 either at the moment. My laptop is
no longer "pure RH9 enough" and my home machine is Fedora Cora beta2
with updates from rawhide.
-- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...?
Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 22 2003 - 04:53:43 EDT