From: Rui Miguel Seabra (rms_at_1407.org)
Date: Thu Nov 20 2003 - 17:57:38 EST
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 14:50, tomasfrydrych_at_yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> I have just downloaded the Iomega Active Disk SDK, and realised that
> the information provided in the orginal comments in bugzilla was not
> accurate. To make the application AD-enabled, you do not actually do
> anything to the application, you merely package the executable inside
> of a standard zip archive together with some other files provided by
> Iomega and a Jscript (or VBScript) you write that allows you set up the
> system before the application is run, and clean it up afterwards.
> So, this means that the SDK licence is not a formal problem.
Ok, if there's no need to use the SDK at all, then we wouldn't be adding
restrictions to users, but maybe we could warn them that Iomega is not
playing fair with them...
-- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...?
Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Nov 20 2003 - 17:57:48 EST