From: Marc Maurer (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Mar 18 2003 - 06:10:15 EST
Sure I can do that as well (and I will). But existing users of the dailt
rpms will have problems upgrading their installed rpms (eg.
1.1.3.YYYYMMDDHHMM < 18.104.22.168). If we bump to 1.9.x this will be no
problem. Also (hopefully) 1.9.x will give users a bit more urge to try
it out, seeing it closing in to 2.0.
Op di 18-03-2003, om 11:40 schreef Rui Miguel Seabra:
> Hi Marc,
> Why don't you fix your bad daily rpm numbering system? :)
> Suggestion: 22.214.171.124-YYYYMMDDHHMM (it always grows...)
> On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 10:33, Marc Maurer wrote:
> > > Anyway if there are no major objections I propose to release 1.1.4 on
> > > March 20th. As usual we'd love to have volunteers to build binaries for
> > > us.
> > No objecttion here. Just a suggestion: can we call it 1.9.x or
> > something? This will fixup my bad daily rpm numbering scheme (ie. 1.1.3
> > < 1.3.99 < 1.9.x).
> > Bye!
> > Marc
-- Marc Maurer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Mar 18 2003 - 06:11:06 EST