From: Mark Gilbert (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 00:06:25 EST
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 23:40, Daniel Jensen wrote:
> BTW, for QA, what's the policy on verifying bugs which are verifiably
> fixed in head but not in stable? Should such bugs get verified as fixed
> unless the bug is slated for fixing in stable (is on the "make 1.0.5 not
> suck" list)?
Change the version field of the bugzilla entry to indicate STABLE cvs
branch, and make a note that the fix needs to be backported (as a
comment). Keep the bug open.
Hub- Perhaps a needbackport keyword to help keep track of these, not
only in this but future stable branches?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 03 2003 - 23:58:25 EST